The Effect of Holistic Planned Grazing on African Rangelands: A Case Study from Zimbabwe
Peel, Mike, and Marc Stalmans, 2018. The Effect of Holistic Planned Grazing on African Rangelands: A Case Study from Zimbabwe, African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 35:1, 23-31, DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2018.1440630.

Key Takeaways

  • South Africa’s Agricultural Research Council completed this study over a 6-year period (2010-2016) comparing the Africa Centre for Holistic Management’s land at Dimbangombe under Holistic Planned Grazing (HGP), to nearby communal areas where HPG was not practiced.
  • The researchers concluded that HPG yields positive long-term effects on ecosystem services (soils and vegetation) and points to the HPG approach enhancing the sustainability of livestock and wildlife in this environment.
  • Dimbangombe had significantly higher rangeland condition than the communal lands: stable perennial grass composition with the plants growing much closer together.
  • In the communal areas, similar improvements were noted on areas where livestock were “kraaled” at night - as they are on Dimbangombe - for up to a week. In the communities where livestock were “kraaled” on cornfields, maize yields were visibly much higher.

Summary

Holistic Planned Grazing™ (HPG) is purported to have positive long-term effects on rangelands, enhancing ecosystem services. Given comparable environmental templates, but different management regimes, vegetation monitoring and landscape function analysis showed the Africa Center for Holistic Management (ACHM) at Dimbangombe had a significantly higher rangeland condition (composition, cover, standing crop and soil health) than adjacent Sizinda (SCR) and Monde (MCR) communal rangelands. Overall grazer density on ACHM is 42% higher than that of SCR (no data for MCR). Finer-scale satellite collar data for ACHM yielded a calculated stocking rate of 0,55 LSU ha-1 y-1 or 24 590 kg km-2, which constitutes high-density grazing. An energy flow estimate shows that the grazing resource would, on average, not be limiting for livestock on ACHM but limiting on SCR. HPG may include an element where kraals are inserted into degraded rangelands for a short period. Overall, ACHM shows stable perennial composition with smaller tufts significantly closer together. A similar result was visible in SCR where maize yields were visibly higher on kraaled areas than on adjacent untreated fields. HPG yields positive long-term effects on ecosystem services (soils and vegetation) and points to the HPG approach enhancing the sustainability of livestock and wildlife in this environment.

Related Library Entries

Your support is vital for grassland regeneration.
On average, a $30 donation helps to influence 100 acres.
Your gift regenerates global grasslands.
One-Time Gift
Support the mission
Monthly Gift
$10+/month
Support the mission
Private online community
Free online course ($99 value)
...and more!

Get the Savory newsletter.

Your monthly dose of inspiration, news, events, & more

We respect your privacy and will never spam or sell your information.
You can unsubscribe at any time.