Who’s afraid of Allan Savory? Scientometric polarization on Holistic Management

Share:
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on reddit

Read full article: “Who’s afraid of Allan Savory? Scientometric polarization on Holistic Management as competing understandings

Summary: This paper uses “scientometrics” to understand the structure of science on Holistic Management (HM) to better understand the controversy underlying it. The authors used papers in Web of Science since 1980 citing the work of Allan Savory, as a way of delineating a field that is otherwise “chaotic with terminology.” Their results show that those who take a positive position on Holistic Management are those doing farm-scale (rather than experimental) work in dry climates. Those working within the various disciplines conducting grazing research are more aligned with what is reported in the bibliographic citations and their expressed opinion on Holistic Management practices. There is a need, say the authors, to resolve competing understandings in specific contexts with diverse participants to inform grazing decisions.

Sherren, Kate, and C. Kent. 2017. Who’s afraid of Allan Savory? Scientometric polarization on Holistic Management as competing understandings. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1-16. doi:10.1017/S1742170517000308.

More from Savory

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Popular Posts

SOCIAL UPDATES

VIDEOS