Regarding Holechek and Briske, and Rebuttals by Teague

This article discusses reports authored by university researchers David Briske and Jerry Holechek that were critical of methods they had attributed to Allan Savory. It is shown that the Briske and Holechek mischaracterized Savory’s work and that, in fact, the types of trials they reviewed are precisely the type that Savory himself discourages.

Get the Savory newsletter.

Your monthly dose of inspiration, news, events, & more

We respect your privacy and will never spam or sell your information.
You can unsubscribe at any time.